John Brown opposed slavery and passionately wanted its abolition. But in the wrong way and criminal insane way:
On May 24th 1856 John Brown and his sons murdered five men who supported slavery. Although none of those men actually owned slaves.
Later during the infamous "John Brown's Raid", Brown and his gang would illegally seize by force an armory at Harpers Ferry, Va. Take hostages. Kill a mayor and four townspeople.
Not to mention the murdering of a free black man who was working as a railroad baggage handler.
Would it be fair to attribute the murdering mayhem of innocent people, perpetrated by John Brown and his gang, to the cause of abolitionists?
Or to their writings and preaching against slavery?
And the very thought of such a thing would be an absolute outrageous falsehood.
Nor would it be fair or correct to attribute in any way the murdering mayhem of innocent people in Norway, perpetrated by monster Anders Breivik, to the important cause of counter-jihadists.
Yet that is the very type of repugnant false accusation the clueless MSM is making with regards to some of the most helpful and resourceful bloggers in their efforts to truthfully inform.
Factually and truthfully informing the public concerning the very real threat and danger posed by the steath jihad, Islamic shariah law, and militant global jihad has been a hallmark of excellence from Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller [Atlas Shrugs], and Gates of Vienna.
It is also an outrageous falsehood, total media distortion, and spin to put any of the blame for Norway's recent terror tradgedy on these helpful bloggers.
Recent remarks made by Marc Sageman, via the NYT, concerning these helpful bloggers are an absolute falsehood:
"Marc Sageman, a former C.I.A. officer and a consultant on terrorism, said it would be unfair to attribute Mr. Breivik’s violence to the writers who helped shape his world view."
[Indeed, it most certainly is unfair to attribute Mr. Breivik's madman carnage to any of those writers or their writings.
And just as it would be false to attribute the shaping of John Brown's twisted mind-set that embraced violence to the writings or preaching of abolitionists, it is also false to attribute the worldview of Mr. Breivik to any of the aforementioned helpful bloggers.]
"But at the same time, he said the counterjihad writers do argue that the fundamentalist Salafi branch of Islam “is the infrastructure from which Al Qaeda emerged."
"Well, they and their writings are the infrastructure from which Breivik emerged.”
The murdering carnage of John Brown did not "emerge" from the cause of abolition, but from his own twisted mind that embraced the evil of violence.
--and the mass-murdering monster Mr. Breivik did not "emerge" from the writings of Atlas Shrugs, Robert Spencer, or Gates of Vienna.
But rather, from his own twisted mind that embraced evil.
Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller [Atlas Shrugs], Gates of Vienna, and a host of other counter-jihadist bloggers are - "jihad-abolitionists".
They inform and enlighten the public in the much worthy cause of--
seeking to abolish Islamic-slavery,
the abolition of discrimination against women and non-Muslim minorities in majority Muslim countries,
the abolition of honor-killings perpetrated against Muslim women,
the abolition of Islamic-shariah law which foments dicrimination and undermines human rights and democracy,
the complete and total abolition of dhimmitude,
the abolition of Islamic supremacism.
This is a "jihad-abolitionist" blogsite.
Norwegian and other MSM have also falsely characterized Breivik as being "Christian".