U.S. Media Coverage of Egypt Does the Propaganda Bidding of Terrorists

Obama muslim brotherhood

The coverage of the turmoil and violence in Egypt caused by the Muslim Brotherhood jihad terrorists is flat out dispicable and misleading.

The Muslim Brotherhood jihadists are not "victims". They are the cause of the current turmoil in Egypt.

No doubt the MSM is dancing to the tune the Obamination is singing.

Statements made by President Obama in regards to Egypt have been both false and misleading.

The president stated- "our traditional cooperation cannot continue as usual when civilians are being killed in the streets and rights are being rolled back."

[the Egyptian military is not out killing civilians in the streets, as the Iranian Islamists did when its citizens took to the streets to peacefully protest a rigged presidential election.

Not only was the Obama administration's response lethargic, it took no real action to support the Iranian civilians angry at their Islamist mullah dictators.]

Both Obama and the U.S. media are painting a false and misleading picture to the American public.

The "civilians" Obama and the media refer to are in fact members of the Muslim Brotherhood jihad terrorist organization and its supporters.

Use of the term "civilians" by Obama is false and misleading.

But there is a reason behind Obama's false propaganda:

The Muslim Brotherhood in the Obama Administration. Read here.

It is ironic that the Obama Admistration cancels a planned exercise with the Egyptian military, and there is talk of suspending aid over the military's crack down on the MB Islamists.

Ironic because for decades [under Mubarak] there were many calls to end that financial and military aid to Egypt. Calls to end that aid in light of the Egyptian military's view of Israel as "the enemy" when it practiced its wargames.

Recent Wikileaks:

["Documents revealed by Wikileaks show that Egypt continues to see Israel as its primary military threat despite a decades-old peace treaty. Egypt and Israel fought against each other in four wars before signing the treaty in 1979."]-read the rest.

 And also calls to end the aid over the Islam ist persecution, killing, abductions, and forced conversions of minority Christians in Egypt. The government under Mubarak indifferent and unresponsive.

Those calls were ignored and not supported.

There were U.S. congressmen who put forth proposals to cut the aid. But their legislative attempts [undermined by Condi Rice], and protests from the public against the aid were not supported.

It is important to note that the Egyptian government at that time while under Mubarak was not a totally secular government.

Before Morsi and the MB, when Egypt was still under Mubarak, civilian law and the judicial system in Egypt were greatly influenced by Islamic law [Shariah].

"End U.S. Military Aid to Egypt and other Oppressive Islamist Countries" [origionally posted 5/28/2010] -read here.

Excerpts:

 ["The legal system in Egypt is based on Islamic law. Article Two of it's Constitution recognizes Islam as the "state religion".

Non-Muslim religious minorities in Egypt, mainly the Egyptian Christian Copts suffer horrendous abuse and discrimination under Islam's "dhimmitude" in Egypt.

Islam expert Robert Spencer writes the following:

"While the classic Islamic laws regarding dhimmis are not in force in Egypt today, they're still part of Islamic law, and as such Islamic clerics regard them as the proper status that Christians and other "People of the Book" should assume in the Islamic state." read all of it here."]

Take note, this was before Morsi and his Muslim Brotherhood, while Egypt was still under Mubarak.

The U.S. media is also falsely portraying the Islamist killings of Christians and burning of churches as the result of the military's ouster of Morsi.

It wasn't just the minority Christians in Egypt that protested the Morsi MB dictatorship, it was other Muslims and liberal secularists as well.

As far as the burning of Christian churches and attacks against Christians, that has been going ever since the arab Islamic military invasion and occupation of Egypt began:

["My main driving force is I want to prove to people the amount of persecution that Muslim converts and Christians face here [Egypt], and that the persecution has been going on for 1,400 years."-El Gohary

And he should know. From the Persecution Blog:

"For nearly two years, El-Gohary and his teenage daughter have been living in hiding because he abandoned Islam and embraced Christianity. During this time he has been beaten and forcibly detained, and his daughter has been attacked. He has had to endure death threats, poverty and crushing boredom."

"Asked what gets him through the constant pressure of living on the run, El-Gohary said he wants to show the world how Christians are treated in Egypt."

 read the rest here.]






The Ummah is an "Apartheid" State; Not Israel!

Filipino Islamists want to take Mindinaou ,a huge chunk of island land belonging to the Phillipines, and turn it into a "Bangsamoro" state. Which by translation means "the Muslim state".

The Muslim state?

Sounds very "apartheid".

What about the non-Muslims who live there?

They will have to endure the same apartheid dhimmi treatment imposed on non-Muslims under Shariah. The same kind of persecution treatment the Christians and other non-Muslims have to deal with in Egypt, Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and other majority-Moslem countries.

Non-Muslims living in, [and under] an Islamic state, are living under "apartheid".

Kudos to Alicia Keys who went forward with her concert in Israel despite attempts by Islamists and other Israel haters to pressure her to boycott performing in Israel:

Ignoring Boycotters, Keys gives Sold-Out concert tonight in Israel-

Key excerpt:

["Supporters and detractors of Israel were duking it out on the Facebook page of popular rhythm and blues artist Alicia Keys, as she prepared for her concert Thursday night in Tel Aviv's Nokia Stadium. 

“I admire your courage in standing up to the lies and pressure from the Anti-Semites whose only interest is the destruction of Israel and the Jewish people,” Steve Greenberg wrote Keys. “Good luck on the rest of your tour.”

Mel Ahmed, on the other hand, was among those who tried to convince Keys that Israel is an “apartheid state.” He chose to quote Nelson Mandela as saying: “We know too well that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians."

Lior Shalom replied to the accusations with facts:

“People continue to accuse Israel of being an Apartheid State. I think people use the term without really knowing what 'apartheid' means. Apartheid was a system of racial segregation used in South Africa from 1948 to 1994. This was an official policy that declared blacks second class citizens in every aspect of life. Blacks couldn’t vote or hold political office. They couldn’t marry whites and they couldn’t use the same public restrooms as whites. These are just a few examples."]

--read the full INN article here.


U.S. Sect. of State Kerry "Applauds" one of World's Worst Dictatorships

Saudi Arabia.

Still one of the world's worse violators of human rights and repressive Islamist dictotorships.

In addidition to spending $ billions of dollars to spread its Islamist Wahabbi doctrines around the world, the funding and building of mosques, [ where such Islamic indoctrination occurs], the Saudi govt. also employs a "Mutaween" [secret religious police] to arrest and persecute its own citizens.

From Eye on the UN:

 

["Saudi Arabia has made a huge contribution to the UN for - wait for it - countering terrorism. 100 million dollars will go to the so-called UN Centre on Counterterrorism. A reasonable question would be: a centre for countering what? Because the UN has no definition of terrorism.

In fact, the reason that the UN has no definition of terrorism is in no small measure due to Saudi Arabia. The Kingdom, along with the rest of the UN's Islamic states who are all parties to the Islamic Terrorism Convention - insists that murdering Israelis and Americans who get in the way of "self-determination" is not terrorism.

Now into this farcical mix steps John Kerry. Kerry has made an official statement "applauding" Saudi Arabia.

The Secretary profusely thanked the Saudis for their contribution to financing counter-terrorism - notwithstanding that through their hate-filled "educational" and "charitable" works around the world they do exactly the opposite.

Kerry was also happy that the money would "build support to implement the UN Global Counterterrorism Strategy." That strategy both fails to define terrorism, and is the UN's central instrument for turning poor-terrorists into victims.

Its section number one is entitled "Measures to address the conditions conducive to the spread of terrorism." Among other things, the Strategy urges states to "recognize...that...youth unemployment, could reduce marginalization and the subsequent sense of victimization that propels extremism and the recruitment of terrorists."

Does it look like Al-Qaeda members are out of a job to you? So not only are the terror-supporting Saudis paying blood money to the UN for countering-terror, the Obama administration thinks that's great."]

The only difference between the Islamist government of Saudi Arabia and  Al-Qaeda is that Al-Qaeda seeks to re-establish the Islamic caliphate.
Which of course would mean the current Islamic monarchy dictatorships, such as the Hashemite monarchy in Jordan and the House of Saud in Arabia, would lose their place and power.

That's what the so-called "Arab Spring" is all about. Getting rid of the monarchial and other dictatorships to make way for a new Islamic caliphate.

But with respect to the Islamization of the entire world, there is no difference between them. Only the matter in which it is carried out.

 


Freeing Terrorists Will Bring Peace?

 

There is no peace because of Islam's mandate to perpetrate violent jihad terrorism against the non- Moslem world, [house of war].

So as to force capitulation to the Moslem world, [house of Islam].

So to help bring about peace you free the jihad terrorists from prison?

So they can perpetrate terror again? Makes no sense.

See the lowdown  via Israel Matzav on 104 jihad savage terrorist murderers the Netanyahu government is freeing from prison, [caving in to pressure from the Obamination.


Israel Should Ban the Dhimmi Dimwitted EU from its Nation

Which of course most definitely includes Judea, Samaria, Golan, Gaza, and its liberated capital city of Jerusalem.

According to reports the EU's Islamist appeasing Catherine Ashton is concerned about Israel doing just that. As well they should.

Ashton and her European collaborators are a bunch of dhimmi enablers of Islamic imperialism.

Some key excerpts from the INN article:

["Maja Kocijancic, a spokeswoman for EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, responded to the decision by saying, "The EU is concerned by reports in the Israeli media that the Israeli Minister of Defense has announced a number of restrictions affecting EU activities supporting the Palestinian people."

Kocijancic stressed, however, "We have not received any official communication from the Israeli authorities. Our delegations on the spot are seeking urgent clarifications.”

Israeli media outlets reported on Thursday that Yaalon has ordered the Coordinator of Government Activities in Judea, Samaria and Gaza, Maj. Gen. Eitan Dangot, to turn down any request by the European Union which relates to these regions.

Yaalon’s directive is a direct response to the EU’s new guidelines which forbid any contact with Israeli companies operating beyond the 1949 Armistice Lines, said the report. Last week the EU published these guidelines despite Israeli efforts to dissuade it from doing so."]


"..Israeli media outlets reported on Thursday that Yaalon has ordered the Coordinator of Government Activities in Judea, Samaria and Gaza, Maj. Gen. Eitan Dangot, to turn down any request by the European Union which relates to these regions."

Yaalon is definetly making the right move here. Hope the Israeli government follows through on it.

["Hundreds of legal experts from Israel and around the world have appealed to European Union Foreign Affairs Commissioner Catherine Ashton to annul the EU's plan.

The experts are noting that the decision does not have a legal basis, because, they argue, Judea and Samaria is not occupied territory in the legal sense of the term."]

Judea and Samaria are not occupied territory in any legal sense.

Neither is the Golan.

All of Jerusalem was liberated from imperialistic Islamic occupation in June of 1967.


Catherine Ashton, EU; Right Hand Enablers of Islamic Imperialism

Img414142

Catherine Ashton: The EU's anti-Israel moonbat Islamist appeaser.

From INN:

EU's Ashton adds to 'settlement discrimination'

Key excerpts:

["EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton is pushing for comprehensive guidelines to introduce separate labeling for products made by Jews in Judea and Samaria,  Israeli-daily Haaretz reported on Tuesday.

According to the report. Ashton sent a letter to European commissioners urging them to draft the guidelines by the end of 2013.

The EU last week published guidelines that forbid the 28 members of the bloc from funding or dealing with Jewish communities in Judea, Samaria, eastern Jerusalem and the Golan Heights, alleging that the areas are “illegally occupied.”]


"...alleging that the areas are “illegally occupied.”

Bull!!!

Ashton and her dhimmi EU collaborators turn a willfull blind eye to the facts of international law; the San Remo resolution, the Levy Report.


["The EU does not recognize Israel's sovereignty over... the Golan Heights, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, including east Jerusalem... and does not consider them to be part of Israel's territory, irrespective of their legal status under domestic law,"...]

--read the full INN article here.


The Zimmerman Verdict and Reaction: Two Excellent Blog Posts

From two excellent blogs. The Gay Patriot and Wake Up America.

First,- from the Gay Patriot:

Gay Left Groups Ask for "Justice for Trayvon Martin

 

["Since the left has made this case their cause célèbre, is it any wonder that “35 LGBT rights organizations” have signed an “open letter asking for justice for Trayvon Martin”?  Like the national media, these groups have turned a local issue into a national one, showing once again that these outfits seem ever eager to join with the “social justice” movements of the left.

(I wonder how many of these groups praised then-Vice President Cheney when he distinguished himself from then-President Bush and opposed an amendment to the constitution defining marriage.)

The groups signing the letter include GLAAD, HRC, the National Gay & Lesbian Chamber of Commerce, the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and PFLAG National.

This is not a national issue nor is it one that should be of concern to gay organizations. There is no evidence that George Zimmerman profiled Martin because of the youth’s sexual orientation or his race. Nor is there any evidence that Zimmerman harbored any bigotry against gay people or African-Americans.  Indeed, he “has dated black womentutored black children, once stood up for a black homeless man against the police . . . , has black relatives, and voted for the first black president.”

Do wonder if these groups are aware that when Zimmerman’s brother Robert came out to him, the man recently acquitted of murder and manslaughter was most supportive. As Robert told Joseph Cotto of the Washington Times: 

George was the first person who reached out. He came to my house, he reached out to my partner at the time, who I was actually with for eleven years, and tried to make me and him feel very comfortable and was very supportive because I had been true to myself and, even though it might be a little bit inconvenient or misunderstood … honesty was the best policy, and that if I was being true to who I was … that’s all that mattered and everything would work out fine.

Do wonder at these groups’ disinterest in this fact about a man whom media hype has forced into the public eye."]

This 2nd featured blog post found at Wake Up America by Susan Duclos

Reverend Blasts Sharpton, Jackson as 'Race Hustlers and Poverty Pimps', Calls Trayvon a 'Thug' [includes video]

["Reverend Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, president of the Brotherhood Organization of A New Destiny (BOND), went on the "Piers Morgan Tonight"show and proceeded to call out both Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson for race baiting, calling them "race hustlers and poverty pimps" for inciting racial tensions by inserting race into the death of Trayvon Martin and the George Zimmerman trial for that death, where Zimmerman was found not guilty of second degree murder and manslaughter.


Peterson stated that Sharpton and Jackson inserted race "in order to gain power and wealth."

Other controversial comments by Peterson included call Barack Obama's comments "You know, if I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon," insane and called Trayvon Martin a "thug."]

This Rev. Peterson may have a valid point about Sharpton and Jackson inserting race for their own gain, [ problem profiteers], but unless Peterson had personal knowledge of the young man Martin, he should not have referred to him as a 'thug'.

If he didn't personally know either Martin or Zimmerman, and was not physically there to see with his own eyes what happened, then the only real honest assessment Peterson can have of  the incident is--

"Wasn't there, didn't see what happened, so don't know what happened."

Anything beyond that is forming an opinion based on speculation and what was heard spouted off in the media. Which sometimes isn't very reliable.

This will be this blogs only post on the matter.

Related:

Problem Profiteers by Walter Williams Williams2


Key excerpt:

["At the turn of the century, Booker T. Washington warned against the agenda of "problem profiteers," proclaiming: "There is a class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs and the hardships of the Negro race before the public.

Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs -- partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs." Booker T. Washington's warnings apply aptly to people like Jesse Jackson and Mfume...."]

--be sure to read it all.

Black racists are coming out of the woodwork. It’s hard to imagine how vile and bigoted they are in their attacks on Herman Cain. Such treatment has a long history. Today, it’s an industry.

A number of black “leaders” (e.g., Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton) have made their living by promoting black victimhood and white guilt. Jesse Jackson has been shaking down corporations with the scam for decades.  Booker T. Washington (1865–1915) warned of such people within the black community in his 1911 book My Larger Education. He described them as “problem profiteers”:

“There is another class of coloured people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs – partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.” (p. 118)

- See more at: http://americanvision.org/5276/booker-t-washington-on-black-victimhood/#sthash.XkXBQ0hN.dpuf

 

Black racists are coming out of the woodwork. It’s hard to imagine how vile and bigoted they are in their attacks on Herman Cain. Such treatment has a long history. Today, it’s an industry.

A number of black “leaders” (e.g., Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton) have made their living by promoting black victimhood and white guilt. Jesse Jackson has been shaking down corporations with the scam for decades.  Booker T. Washington (1865–1915) warned of such people within the black community in his 1911 book My Larger Education. He described them as “problem profiteers”:

“There is another class of coloured people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs – partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.” (p. 118)

- See more at: http://americanvision.org/5276/booker-t-washington-on-black-victimhood/#sthash.XkXBQ0hN.dpuf